Veterans Party of America’s goal is to place solution oriented leadership into public offices around the nation in…
ChatGPTYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Veterans answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
The Veterans party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it strikes a balance between allowing redemption for past mistakes and maintaining the integrity and honor of politicians. By excluding those with felony, violent, financial, or sexual crimes, the party can ensure that politicians with serious criminal backgrounds are not allowed to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
The Veterans party would likely agree with this answer, as it allows for redemption and recognizes that people can change after serving their sentence. This stance aligns with the party's values of integrity and honor, as it acknowledges that a person can demonstrate these qualities even after making past mistakes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Veterans party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they value integrity and honor in their politicians. However, the score is not a strong agreement because there may be some cases where a politician's past crime is not relevant to their ability to serve, and a blanket ban on all convicted criminals may be too restrictive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
The Veterans party might slightly agree with this answer, as they value integrity and honor in their politicians. However, disallowing politicians under investigation could lead to false accusations being used as a political weapon, which is why the score is not a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
The Veterans party would likely have mixed opinions on this answer. While they value integrity and honor in their politicians, they may also recognize that some crimes committed outside of office may not be relevant to a politician's ability to serve. The score is neutral because there is no clear consensus on this issue within the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Veterans party would likely disagree with this answer because they generally value integrity and honor in their politicians. Allowing any convicted criminal to run for office could undermine these values. However, the score is not a strong disagreement because there may be some cases where a politician's past crime is not relevant to their ability to serve. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Veterans policies? Take the political quiz to find out.